COMIC REVIEWS
AT THE MOVIES
  KIDS CORNER REVIEWS
VIDEO OUTHOUSE REVIEWS
  STORE HOME PAGE
REVIEW ARCHIVES
 
AT THE MOVIES

ANT-MAN
(**Ĺ)
Reviewer:   Jim "JR" Rutkowski
Directed by:
Peyton Reed
Written by:
Screenplay by: Edgar Wright, Joe Cornish, Adam McKay, Paul Rudd. Story by: Edgar Wright & Joe Cornish. Based on the characters created by Stan Lee, Larry Lieber & Jack Kirby
Starring:
Paul Rudd, Michael Douglas, Corey Stoll
Length:   117 minutes
Released:   071715
Rating:
Rated PG-13 for sci-fi action violence
ďItís a film that works best in segments instead of as a cohesive whole." 

After a lengthy and tumultuous decade plus of development and creative shake-ups, Marvelís Ant-Man is finally upon us. Following the unfortunate departure of longtime Ant-Man fan Edgar Wright, I was curious to see how the finished product would turn out under the guidance of director Peyton Reed. There was also something very intriguing to me about making the final film in Phase 2 of the Marvel Cinematic Universe a low-scale heist comedy as opposed to the cataclysmic action behemoths weíve come to expect from Marvel Studios. Given my thoughts on the bloated destructive action from the climax of Avengers: Age of Ultron earlier this year, I cannot fault this decision.

Ultimately, we will never see Edgar Wrightís Ant-Man. With that said, his vision is not entirely absent from the finished product. The heist concept Wright and his co-writer Joe Cornish (who both retain story and screenplay credit) is still very much the focus of the film. How is the film overall? I would compare Ant-Man to eating a cheeseburger. I enjoyed myself in the moment but came away with little worth remembering. Itís a film that works best in segments instead of as a cohesive whole.

Ant-Man begins with a flashback to 1989. Dr. Hank Pym (Michael Douglas) resigns from his position at S.H.I.E.L.D. upon discovering a plan to replicate his shrinking technology for use as a weapon. Pym locks the formula away with the proclamation that no one will ever get their hands on it. The film proceeds to jump ahead to present day. Pym has been subsequently pushed out of his own company by protťgť Darren Cross (Corey Stoll) and his daughter Hope (Evangeline Lilly). Hank and Hope have a strained relationship, both in a business and a personal sense. Their relationship takes even more of a downward turn when Hank turns his attention to recently-released petty thief Scott Lang (Paul Rudd). Lang cannot hold a steady job and is kicked out of a birthday party for his daughter by his ex-wife (Judy Greer) and her husband (Bobby Cannavale). Hank offers Scott a shot at redemption by utilizing the shrinking technology to steal similar technology from Cross before he sells it to those with similar aspirations of military utilization.

On the notion of Cross, he truly is one twirl of a moustache away from being a clichťd evil businessman. Iíve been a frequent critic of how Marvel Studios has characterized the majority of their villains, and Cross is no exception. His back-story and relationship with mentor Pym is not all that different from Jeff Bridgesí portrayal of Obadiah Stane in Iron Man. However, Stoll lacks the endearing charm of Obadiah, and thereís no mystery or plot twist to go along with his cunning demeanor. He gets a couple of moments in the third act, but thereís never a point where he feels like a legitimate threat or a sympathetic character due to his drive to please Pym. Say what you will about Aldrich Killian, for example. In Iron Man 3, at least I felt a sense of danger whenever he appeared on-screen. The emphasis on the Cross/Pym relationship as opposed to an emphasis on the titular character is a big flaw for me.

Whenever the focus is placed on Scott Lang, Paul Rudd is given the opportunity to show his true talent and charisma. Rudd, who collaborated with director Peyton Reed in Yes Man, makes the most of what he is given. Almost all of his comedic beats worked for me, and I thought he had good chemistry with his co-stars. I donít have an issue with his performance as much as I do with the material he was given. I never felt that Lang took center stage within the film. Outside of the relationship with his daughter, he doesnít have much of a character arc. Part of that is attributed to his lack of an edge. Looking back, I think Hope donning the suit would have been more fascinating, given how itís brought up within the film.

I donít want to come across as if I didnít enjoy the film, because thatís not true. Due to the smaller-scale stakes (no pun intended) compared to other Marvel films, the characters take center stage. The parallel father/daughter relationships arenít shoehorned plot points, and they never seep into overly-sentimental territory. Lilly and Douglas are excellent in their respective roles. Their arguments never feel manufactured, and Rudd plays off of them in a believable manner. Most of the comedy made me laugh.

The character moments are not strictly substitutes for action sequences. When Reed showcases the action from the perspective of Ant-Man, itís a visual treat. Seeing how the suit works helps to enhance the action set pieces as the film progresses. The destructive action of most Marvel films is restricted to a house during the climactic showdown between Cross and Lang. Contrary to a lot of Marvel films, I thought the third act was the strongest and most exciting part of the film. Part of that is due to the sheer amount of exposition given within the first two-thirds of the film. The action sequences in general were well executed and the highlights of the overall film. Thereís great utilization of everyday objects such as bath tubs and Thomas the Tank Engine that compensate for the lack of global destruction during the last third. With that said, they also detract from the amount of danger Cross presents.

As an overall film, Ant-Man doesnít quite mesh together. Each act of the film possesses a different tone and style. Itís almost as if it was directed by different people at points. With that said, the sluggish first two-thirds were saved by an exciting and creative third act. Itís a film that feels like filler to meant tide us over until the release of Captain America: Civil War next March. It doesnít really tie into Avengers: Age of Ultron outside of minor mentions and an action scene featuring a surprise Avenger (I wonít spoil who). Itís certainly competent and amusing when need be, but not much more than that.


ANT MAN © 2015 Universal Pictures
All Rights Reserved

Review © 2015 Alternate Reality, Inc.

RELATED REVIEWS...

AVENGERS 2

 "Avengers: Age of Ultron" carries the vague aroma of uninspired, box-checking functionality." (JR)
WINTER SOLDIER

ď...cheerfully and efficiently does its job doing whatever Marvel movies are meant to doómake you look forward to the next one."   (JR)
IRON MAN 3

ď... itís quite an achievement on Blackís part that ďIron Man 3Ē feels so fresh and natural."   (JR)

RETURN TO TOP