| 
 
 (082709)
  
  
  
Quentin Tarantino has always worn his references proudly. An acknowledged cinema 
geek whose early years were spent in blissful self-education in the motifs of 
B-movies, noir pulp and the generic gestures of spaghetti Westerns and 1970s 
exploitation flicks, he went on to create films that stole from the best, and 
sometimes worst, that Hollywood had to offer. Like a delirious and sometimes 
demented magpie, Tarantino feathered his movies with the detritus of pop 
culture, creating visceral, glibly funny pastiches ("Reservoir Dogs," "Pulp 
Fiction") and, once in a while, even delivering stories about recognizable human 
beings ("Jackie Brown"). 
 
With the eagerly anticipated "Inglourious Basterds," Tarantino manages to 
simultaneously surprise and revert to predictable form. The surprise lies in his 
choice of period and subject matter. Set in France during World War II, "Inglourious 
Basterds" tells the fictionalized story of a special squad of American Jews 
whose mission to kill and capture German soldiers was uniquely practical and 
symbolic. But as rich as the subject matter is in both action and metaphor, in 
Tarantino's hands it becomes mere scaffolding for his chief preoccupation, which 
is the movies. 
 
From the admittedly breathtaking opening sequence, which in its meticulous 
staging, pacing and acting pays loving homage to the work of Sergio Leone, to 
the Grand Guignol of a climax set in a Paris cinema, "Inglourious Basterds" 
isn't about history or war, or people and their problems, or anything of 
substance or meaning. It's a movie about other movies. For all its visual 
bravura and occasional bursts of antic inspiration, it feels trivial, the work 
of a kid who can't stop grabbing his favorite shiny plaything. 
 
To the degree that viewers share Tarantino's obsessions -- with cinema, music 
and bloody, ritualized violence -- they will enjoy "Inglourious Basterds," which 
undoubtedly possesses its share of grace notes. Finest by far is the German 
actor Christoph Waltz, who in a revelatory performance plays the German colonel 
and legendary "Jew hunter" Hans Landa. Waltz appears in that fabulous opening 
sequence, confronting a French dairy farmer whom he suspects of harboring a 
fugitive Jewish family. As he drinks a glass of the farmer's fresh milk, Waltz's 
Landa takes his place among the pantheon of great film villains, the 
personification of smiling evil and playful, menacing politesse. 
 
That first scene turns out to presage much of what is to follow in "Inglourious 
Basterds," whose structure pretty much comes down to scenes of people talking 
followed by paroxysms of brutal violence (although it must be said that 
Tarantino shows admirable restraint in the first outburst). What's more, it ends 
with the movie's most problematic stumper, a gesture that is completely out of 
keeping for a chief character, but without which the movie would have nowhere to 
go. 
 
Landa is by far the strongest character in "Inglourious Basterds," which stars 
Brad Pitt as his American counterpart, Lt. Aldo Raine, (a not-so-subtle tribute 
to actor Aldo Ray) who early in the movie is shown assembling a group of Jewish 
soldiers whose mission is to do "one thing and one thing only: killin' Nazis." 
Only in Pitt's attempt at Smoky Mountain vernacular, that last line comes out 
sounding like "one thang and one thang only: killin' Nattzies." Mustached and 
flinty-eyed, Pitt's character ends his speech by announcing that he's part 
Apache, and as such will insist that each of his men owes him "one hunnert 
Nattzie scalps." (The deliberate misspellings of the title, presumably, are 
meant to simultaneously pay homage and make a crucial distinction from the 1978 
Italian war movie "The Inglorious Bastards.") Audiences may be shocked to 
realize that after the Pitt-centric trailers that focus almost exclusively on 
his big ra-ra speech to the troops, the headliner may not clock in at even an 
hour’s worth of screen time in the 153-minute flick. 
 
Because it's Tarantino, viewers can rest assured that we'll see those scalps 
being taken. And we'll see a character called "the Bear Jew" -- played in one of 
several instances of stunt casting by pulp horror director Eli Roth (who cannot 
act worth a damn)-- beating a German soldier to death with a baseball bat. In an 
attempt to go "The Dirty Dozen" one dirtier, Tarantino piles on yet another 
macabre flourish, in the form of a swastika that Raine carves into the foreheads 
of the Germans he doesn't kill. Doling out such graphic sequences like so many 
dog biscuits, Tarantino clearly has sought to reward the "Kill Bill" crowd who 
just can't get enough of guts, gore and torture. In a second plot line, the 
beautiful owner of a Paris movie theater (played by Mlanie Laurent) begins her 
own plot against the Nattzies, one that hinges on the premiere of a propaganda 
film featuring the German version of Audie Murphy and the flammable properties 
of old-fashioned nitrate film stock.  
 
Those quick to complain about all the talk-talk-talk in his Grindhouse segment, 
Death Proof, were not so quick to acknowledge that all the girl talk was leading 
somewhere, establishing Zoe Bell’s nine lives or justifying how stupid it is to 
ride the hood of a speeding car. All the second act conversations keep the film 
firmly planted at a stand still. Everything that could be said in three 
sentences is said in thirty. Sometimes it works as in precisely how much Italian 
the chosen Basterds know and sometimes it doesn’t as in the extension of the 
already lengthy basement sequence where Pitt interrogates Kruger over knowledge 
that we already have. Kruger painfully overplays her toughness in this scene in 
a manner that makes Laurent’s carefully brimming avenger all the more 
tremendous. Pitt, on the other hand, overplays his southern drawl and impudence 
with just the right measure, lending more credence that his skills as a comic 
actor are immeasurably under-appreciated. Quite the opposite is true though of 
Mike Myers who shows up for one scene as a British superior talking about Hitler 
and the theater. Anyone not clear that Hitler will be there? As this scene 
occurs before the basement, it’s the first real chink in Basterds’ armor, 
distracting us with another of Myers’ limited variations on smirking accents. 
His performance is so mannered and overtly familiar that it wouldn’t be out of 
the realm to watch him raise a pinky to his lips. In turn, Tarantino could have 
benefited his filmmaker friend, Roth, by turning his character into a mute. 
Effectively menacing by anti-hero standards when silent, but giving Quentin’s 
skewered work as an actor a run for its money anytime he opens his mouth. 
 
Busy, busy, busy. And it gets even more frenetic when the Basterds conspire in a 
plot against Third Reich bigwigs with a gorgeous German double agent (and 
actress) played by Diane Kruger channeling Marlene Dietrich, and a dashing, 
unflappable British officer (and film critic) played by the terrific Irish actor 
Michael Fassbender channeling Trevor Howard. With name-checks of Leni 
Riefenstahl, G.W. Pabst and the movie studio UFA dropped like so many bundled 
incendiaries, "Inglourious Basterds" often feels like a windy tutorial in prewar 
German cinema history, broken up by the odd firefight or brutal murder. Mashing 
up visual styles and musical eras with blithe anachronistic license, Tarantino 
at one point stages a scene to resemble "The Lady From Shanghai" by way of a 
dime-store pulp novel, set to David Bowie's "Cat People (Putting Out Fire)." 
 
If only the Allies had had Tarantino on their side; he could have made Hitler's 
head explode. As it happens, they must instead settle on having their actions 
and exploits extruded through his own bizarre sense of cruelty, spectacle and 
talky, post-modern irony. (Characters are routinely introduced by way of cheesy 
'70s-era screen titles.) In his defense, Tarantino announces right off the bat 
that "Inglourious Basterds" is little more than a fairy tale, in a title that 
reads, "Once upon a time in . . . Nazi-Occupied France." Still, even with the 
most elaborately embroidered myth, it helps to believe at least one word of it. 
 
It's interesting that "Inglourious Basterds" follows two other movies that have 
spun their own tales of comeuppance and macho Jewish heroism: last year's "Valkyrie," 
which turned real-life attempts to assassinate Hitler into a sleek, "Mission: 
Impossible"-like thriller, and "Defiance," which received high marks from 
historians for getting the story right about real-life Jewish partisans who 
bravely fought back. Compared with those relatively sober films, "Inglourious 
Basterds" unspools less like bold revisionism than a lurid wish fulfillment 
fantasy of revenge, cinephilia and carnage. Tarantino isn't interested in 
telling an authentic or believable story in "Inglourious Basterds" so much as 
using World War II as a backdrop for his ongoing enterprise of cinematic 
recycling. He's managed to feather yet another one of his nests, which at this 
point are feeling all the more flimsy for being overstuffed. 
   |