| 
 (070607) 
When Michael Moore makes a movie these days, all hell seems to break loose. It 
gets to a point where whatever message he’s trying to communicate is drowned out 
by all the media attention, knee-jerk reactionaries, and general resentment. 
With “Sicko,” Moore is embarking on a topic that is vital to the might of 
America, seeded with a message that everyone in the country should be, at the 
very least, aware of. This is health care, and it is killing our nation. 
 Of course, I’ve been a great admirer of Moore’s for some time, 
always willing to embrace his big screen pole vaults of satire and acidic truth. 
“Sicko” comes after the unreal success of “Fahrenheit 9/11,” a picture that gave 
Moore the most power he’s ever enjoyed and sent his loudest critics into a 
spastic, wildly entertaining Curly-shuffle of frustration. It comes as little 
surprise that Moore, now with the world’s attention, has selected the hornet’s 
nest issue of health care for his latest picture.
 
 “Sicko” is a persuasive piece of “informational entertainment,” 
(perhaps “documentary” no longer covers what Moore is trying to accomplish 
here), picking up a rock and throwing at the fanged, mile-high, tentacled beast 
called privatized health care. It’s a spectacular look at America and the 
corruption that rots our very core, swallowing the interests of our leaders and 
mercilessly disposing of our most needy. Did I mention the film is a comedy?
 
 Narrated by and appearing in the second half of the film is Moore, 
who is astounded that his country is unwilling to fix what clearly is a broken 
system. “Sicko” isn’t a comprehensive argument for repair, but it isn’t meant to 
be. Moore gives the viewer enough examples of failure and deception to cook up a 
frothy stew of amazement and poignancy, spending time with the individuals 
instead of a flow chart of indifference. Not every corner of health care is 
exposed; Moore leaves that minutiae to the political pundits, as they chase 
their tails to a point of exhaustion and social irresponsibility. Instead, Moore 
paints a dramatic picture of the way things are headed, and his point of view is 
shocking.
 
 At times bitingly hilarious and other times profoundly horrific, 
“Sicko” provocatively examines how America built its current system of coverage, 
tracing the line back to Nixon, who supported Henry Kaiser and his efforts to 
extract top dollar for lowball health care. The fruit of that greed is found 
today, with over 47 million Americans living without health insurance and the 
rest barely able to stay ahead of their co-pays, rate hikes, and flimsy denials 
the insurance providers abuse to shake off the undesired.
 
 Moore steps out to meet those who were refused benefits for a 
variety of unethical reasons; middle-class folk from the U.S. who became tangled 
in the system with no chance for survival. One gentleman without coverage had to 
“Sophie’s Choice” which finger he could afford to reattach after a carpentry 
accident. Another elderly couple is so lost in debt from their medical co-pay 
bills they have to move in with their kids for help. Several other stories zero 
in on the increasingly ludicrous and fraudulent ways the insurance giants dodge 
their obligation of payment. These tales are purposefully venomous, casting the 
industry in a viciously unflattering light where every person insured is just 
dollar sign for the money mulch, and not a human being.
 
 Without question, the cancer at the heart of the predicament is 
greed. In America, health care is almost an exclusive club, and membership is 
becoming increasingly difficult to acquire. As with any business, the bottom 
line is profit; however with health care, shouldn’t compassion and a hint of 
fairness come into play? Money says no, the government says no, and this sends 
Moore to other countries to find out where fair play factors into the business 
of restoring health to humans.
 
 The second half of “Sicko” jets Moore to Canada, France, and Britain 
to take a peek at how their health systems operate and to meet American 
expatriates who bolted from their home country for greener medicinal pastures. 
The result is traditional bouncy Moore-ish revelations of a utopian, socialized 
industry that considers the patient before the pay. Now, the intricacies of the 
foreign systems are not addressed (see Denys Arcand‘s “The Barbarian Invasions” 
for a more sobering look at Canada’s health system), but Moore has never been 
one to stop a film for the smaller details. He’s going after the larger 
juxtapositions of countries that are willing to help their citizens versus the 
American system, which, in the feature, resembles a relentless jackal scrambling 
for every ounce of meat it can sink its teeth into before being caught.
 
 Moore being Moore, there is brief footage of President Bush boobing 
it up in public about the American work ethic and health concerns, yet “Sicko” 
is not a political picture. Outside of roasting Hilary Clinton on her 
repulsively two-faced history with the health care industry (the film is a lite 
version of “Fahrenheit 9/11” for Clinton) and a general understanding that most 
politicians are corrupt and couldn’t care less about their country, “Sicko” hugs 
tightly to the human element, openly hypothesizing that change will only arrive 
on these shores when average Americans stop fearing their government as taught 
and take the future of the nation into their own hands.
 
 For his master stroke, Moore takes a group of 9/11 rescue workers 
currently in the throes of debilitating health situations to Guantanamo Bay, 
Cuba, where it was revealed that suspected terrorists in detention at the 
American military base were offered the finest health care imaginable, while our 
“heroes” were left to rot in a system that denied them coverage due to miles of 
red tape and sickening indifference. The sequence is a beaut, working both as an 
ironic comedic premise Moore is truly gifted at spinning and as an eye-opening 
look at Cuba’s health system; a working model of ramshackle productivity in a 
country we’ve all been taught to hate, without the slightest understanding how 
it actually conducts business.
 
 I can’t imagine “Sicko” will be as polarizing as previous Moore 
efforts, but there are those who make a living hating the man (if only the anti-Vin 
Diesel lobby paid!). I choose to view Moore as rotund, filthy rich superhero, 
trying his best to defend the population and inform the greater good. Even if 
his intentions are blown off course or his ego unrivaled, his goals are always 
admirable, and his motion pictures are consistently hysterical, devastating, 
dynamic pieces of entertainment.
 
 |